Wednesday, February 19, 2014

Cool or 'kulelat'?

-->          



 
It’s always interesting to listen to concerned Catholics animatedly discussing the Church’s (non-existent) media savvy.  The spontaneity is amazing.  We criticize, tease, and laugh at ourselves for being “kulelat”—the poorest and the weakest—when it comes to television evangelization, for one.

            “Look at the Iglesia ni Kristo,” one would blurt out, “they have like three channels, they’re all over!  And their anchors are well-rehearsed performers who stick to the script and wear coat and tie—mukhang kagalang-galang!  Everybody cheered in agreement.
            A bishop would interject, “Once when I was abroad, my host, a devout Catholic, congratulated me for this ‘very slick and sosyal na worship program with a multinational choir’ that he had seen on tv. When I asked him what program it was, kay Quiboloy pala!  He thought it was a Catholic production because to him it looked so polished, so grand!”
            A laywoman would admit, “We are Catholics but we watch 700 Club at home; their stories are very inspiring.”  Another would say, “Ah, kami, our television is always set on EWTN; they have solid stuff that make us better understand our religion.  What we miss in the Sunday homilies we get there.  And they have programs for every member of the family.”
            Someone would lament, “So many Christian communities and denominations have their own regular programs or channels, and they are very aggressive, with impassioned speakers often putting the Catholic teachings down; how come we have none?”  Another would quip, “Hey, we have TV Maria!  But you’d be lucky to find it because it’s way out at the tail end of the channels, the last one in our set, after the foreign language programs nobody cares to watch!”  
      
            I’ve attended a few such discussions, and in fairness, the discussants are sincere and enthusiastic about wanting to “do something about it”.  We feel challenged and bullish, especially when we know we are counted upon by Church leaders to help.  We are convinced that the splendor of our faith must not be kept hidden under the bed but must be revealed to give light to the world.  We brainstorm and cook up ideas that establish the Church’s presence in media, and so we resolve to infect our parishes and families with our enthusiasm.
            “Let’s do this, we have so many talents in our parishes with time to spare, just waiting to help us!  Our problem is treasures.”
            “Money shouldn’t be a problem.  We can tap our rich parishioners, our well-placed contacts, pull strings to get moving.  Sabihin mo lang, request ng bishop!” 
            “I have a friend in the computer programming business who’s willing to create apps for free, basta sa Church, libre!”
            “The institution I work for has state-of-the-art recording facilities—in case you need to produce videos or radio spiels, just give us a call.”
            “Let’s saturate Facebook and Twitter with gospel messages!  All my children, of school age, are techies, I’ll get them all to post bible verses instead of those superficial stuff!”
            “Yes, let’s spur our techie children to produce videos, movies, even whole television shows that appeal to the young!  All these New Evangelization efforts are for them anyway, the future generation!”
            “Yeah, we can go into computer games even!  That’s where the young people are!  We can ask our techie grandchildren to create games using biblical characters and themes!”

            Clap, clap, clap!
            We’ve got to admit that the applause sometimes makes us forget what we’re rooting for, and that we’re supposed to be rooted in Christ.  In our eagerness to ride on the crest of media megatrends, to look and sound “cool” and therefore prove that we won’t be “kulelat” forever, we rely mostly on mere technology to spread the Good News.  Sooner than later, our role has shifted from being prophets to horn-tooters, calling attention to ourselves instead of the Lord.
            The result—even Catholic or Christian advertisements come across as antithetical to gospel values sometimes.  They may mean well but they do not, for instance, witness to the beatitudes.  There was one print ad published a few years back by a relief agency.  In the photo were several pairs of old sneakers lined up, with a child wearing the last pair.  The child’s legs were grimy, but the shoes were Nike’s.  The tagline said:  “Blessed are the poor.”
            What the heck was that supposed to mean?  Are the poor blessed because the rich give them discarded high-end stuff?   Is it in keeping with Jesus’ teachings for the haves to create in the have-nots an appetite for expensive things?  Aren’t the rich “more blessed” because they give while the poor receive?  

            Solidarity with the poor certainly never meant the rich can make a trash can out of the poor.  How I’d like to see an advertisement which encourages the rich to buy new items not for themselves but for the poor.  For a change, let’s ask the rich to stop making “charity” as an excuse to buy, buy, buy and buy more.  Why not try to buy new things to give to the poor and then wear your old things until they disintegrate?  Eat what the poor folk eat; own only things the poor can afford.  Then you’ll know what it’s like to be poor.
            But this “Blessed are the poor” ad (and others of its kind) helps neither the poor nor the rich.  They don’t question our motives nor probe the depths of our intentions; they simply cuddle the false values we already nurse in our hearts.  They merely preserve the status quo.
            So we want to be “cool” evangelizers.  Okay, dude, let’s utilize new media, teach our bishops to Tweet and impress competitors.  But let’s begin at the root of things, not from the incidentals.  For evangelization to become a genuine communication of the Good News, the evangelizer must first embody the message.  Yes, as Jesus did.  And that’s the truth. 



Wednesday, February 05, 2014

A challenge to the laity


It is alarming how so many minors figure in various crimes today, particularly those we can call dark ways of earning a living: petty theft and robbery, bag snatching, ambushing motorists, breaking into homes, etc.  As the news reveals, these are mostly children of the poor, unwittingly lending themselves to exploitation on account of their poverty.

But there is a more searing poverty evident in these child offenders—it is their lack of consciousness that they are children of God.
It doesn’t need an expert in child psychology to see that these children were not made aware earlier in life of the presence of God, much less of God’s love and providence.  What’s dangerous is, our continued exposure to such news of “juvenile delinquency” could desensitize us to their condition until we in our complacency begin to accept it as “normal”. 
      However, it is not too late to reverse an apparent trend—young parents of the 21st century can still be guided by Mary and Joseph who fulfilled the law that required their child to be consecrated to the Lord.  The year 2014, being Year of the Laity for us Catholics in the Philippines, could be an opportune time to move towards “empowering” our lay people not just for a year, or a decade, but also for generations to come—by “empowering” our children now.  This “empowerment” means consecrating our children to the Lord in order to lay a foundation that is beneficial to children, their parents, and society as a whole.
Aware of the paternity of God to their children, parents will appreciate the young ones’ dignity and will raise them with respect.  Children who are nurtured on the conviction that they are children of God—and are hand-led in the ways of the Lord—will develop a greater sense of the divine in their nature and will be inclined to regard their bodies with dignity as they grow older.
Teaching children that work is a gift from the same God makes them value labor accordingly and gives them a higher purpose in employing their talents to earn a living.  Thus, they will not be easily swayed to cooperate in dubious money-making activities by predatory elders.
While this sounds doable, the reality stares us in the face as well: that there are parents who need enlightenment for they themselves grew up in the dark.  Such are those who rent their children out to syndicates to beg on the streets, or who pimp for their children to make quick bucks from cybersex and prostitution.  How pathetic to see that parents could violate their own children for the sake of “a better life for the family”!  How will these parents be led out of the dark—and who will do it?  It is a challenge to our laity in year 2014 that is too great to be ignored.
If indeed we laypeople believe and proclaim that we are “called to be saints and sent forth as heroes”, there is no nobler place to begin spreading the Good News than at home, consecrating our children to Our Father. And if we laity must be true to our “mission of sanctification and transformation of the world”, we should reach out to the truly poor in our midst, and not be content with curling up in the comfort of our sanitized homes and singing hymns while sleepwalking in our beautiful churches.  And that’s the truth.


How Secular Carmelites can embody the Rule of St. Albert today

  + April 23, 2026 First, a reminder: the Rule of St. Albert was written for hermits on Mount Carmel—not for people with traffic, deadline...