Part 1: What do gays really want?
They’ve
done it again—secular media misrepresenting Pope Francis, this time zeroing in
on his words "If a person is gay and seeks the
Lord and has good will, who am I to judge that person?... these persons must
never be marginalized and they must be integrated into society…" spoken during
the press briefing held on
his return flight from Brazil’s World Youth Day celebrations. The Holy Father said something
perfectly Christian, yet gay marriage advocates would be quick to take that as
a sign that this pope is pro-gay and will be the one to deliver the Catholic
Church from the dark ages, quote unquote.
The
more countries come to legalize same sex marriage, the more convinced I get
that advocates and legislators of gay marriage alike neither understand nor
accept the meaning of the word “marriage.” At least that’s what I observe. In spite of their insistence that in their same-sex marriage
advocacy all they want is “equal rights” for gays, what they actually want is
for everybody else to change their view of reality. In the process they sometimes get themselves in ridiculous
situations that seem to uncover envy as the root of their cause, like this
garden wedding held at a restaurant in the suburbs.
The
waiters were giggling in the kitchen because they had heard the pastor say to
the couple, “Ang churva ng Panginoon,
magmahalan kayo…” Churva is a
word found in the Filipino gay vocabulary, as followers of local noontime
television only know too well. It
turned out the pastor was gay, and so were the bride and the bride. One of them wore a white party dress,
the other sported manly attire; the pastor wore a chasuble. The wedding was replete with cord,
candle and veil, with corresponding sponsors, and the pastor used grape juice
instead of wine for the “consecration”.
At the reception that followed, the newly weds cut a wedding cake and
fed each other a spoonful, while
the pastor teased a boyish looking waiter (in
Pilipino), “Are you circumcised?”, giving the kitchen staff more giggle time.
What
are gays and lesbians really after when they lobby for same-sex marriage, I
asked a gay friend. He replied,
“We are envious—kayo lang ba ang may
karapatan? We want to have
beautiful weddings like you guys, to publicly declare our love for each other,
to live together openly! We want
commitment from our partners, it would be nice to be someone’s one and only
forever and ever…” He knows it is
wishful thinking, though; he would not dare march in the streets to get his
heart’s desires because even admitting he’s gay would be his undoing. He is Muslim, and his father in
Mindanao would disown him if he found out his son “is a woman trapped in a
man’s body.” He continued, “I have a cousin who’s also gay. When in our hometown, min kami, we act and sound like men, malaki ang boses namin at saka barako kaming
mag-aasta, pero sa men’s room, tita, naga-apir
kami, ahahay! Dito lang sa Manila
ladlad ang kapa namin!
Otherwise, babayoo,
inheritance!”
This
gay Muslim friend studied in and graduated from Catholic universities, so he
knows the Church teaching on marriage—a sacrament involving one man and one
woman, a gift from God to humanity leading to procreation, the foundation of
the family, etc. He is quite
resigned to his fate that one day he will have to court a woman, “My family and
my community expect me to get married and
have a family. In fact, my father even wants me to run
for mayor—poor, unsuspecting papa, bless his soul! In a way I am lucky because my life at least follows a
relatively safe path, unlike those gay marriage advocates who are lost. I’m gay, I understand them, but I
really think they’re lost. If you
tell them about marriage being a sacrament, they’ll laugh at you! They don’t care what the Church
teaches; they feel deprived and discriminated against, all they care about is
to get even by crying for the same privileges as the heterosexual couples.”
Part
2: Gay marriage in the
Philippines?
Would the same-sex marriage movement allegedly gaining ground among
First World governments catch on in the Philippines? I don’t think so.
Homosexuals from conservative families (like my Muslim friend) or those
in sensitive occupations like teaching or civil service would be too resigned
to care or dare to join lobby groups, knowing they have much to lose if they
did.
The gays from the masses—like the four street dwellers I met at a soup
kitchen who live in a kariton—believe
that being dirt poor they have nothing to lose anyway so they just do their
thing. They scavenge for a living
and all their belongings are in their kariton;
they sleep where the night finds them; they rely on broken fire hydrants, the
Pasig River, and public toilets to wash themselves and their clothes. What’s more important for them is their
survival, and not supporting some alien concept they have no need for.
Same sex marriage pressure groups abroad might hope to find some
sympathy and support from the high profile gays, but in our country the latter
enjoy more privileges than the average Filipino, so how can they possibly feel
deprived or discriminated against?
They are not only tolerated or accepted, they are even admired and
adored—they are celebrities who host radio and TV shows, star in movies,
endorse products in big time advertising, hobnob with the elite whose parties
they write about in their lifestyle columns. They have big businesses (not only fashion-related)
and make no efforts to hide their sexual preferences; they even let media
friends publicize the plush homes they Would they need to march in the streets
in the name of “equal rights”?
They don’t need to change laws to make them happy—they can fly off
anytime to have their gay wedding in Las Vegas.
share with their long time lovers.
So, what kind of gays might be influenced to join the gay marriage
bandwagon? One group could be the
“un-churched”, those who grew up without being taught the social and moral
value of marriage but want the ritual ceremony anyway.
Another would be the “incurable romantics” who, in spite of their
membership in a church, tend to blindly follow fads and ape their celebrity
idols. Here belongs the parlorista who used to cut my hair—a
biological male who insists he is a girl and uses birth control pills to make
him look like one. He is young
enough to sincerely hope and pray that his boyfriend will give up his
girlfriend in order to marry him.
Comprising the third group would be those who had been traumatically
rebuffed by their family and society for being “queer” children—this may
include similarly wounded intellectuals who have come to reject the moral
guidance offered by any religion.
A fourth would be those who equate being openly gay with being cool,
relying on First World militant gay support for affirmation—or for higher
popularity ratings as in the case of certain celebrities who have recently come
out of their straight closet.
Unable to see beyond their own satisfaction, these above-mentioned gays,
whether male or female, are not in a position to care about the long-range
effects of homosexual relationships on public health, national economy, peace
and order, and population growth.
They would hardly be conscious of the hidden agenda of gay marriage
advocates nor would they likely scrutinize the demands of same-sex marriage
advocates before taking the latter’s side. For them the issue is simply one of belonging—by identifying
with the militant gays they believe they belong, they feel empowered, they
acquire a voice.
Part 3: I love gays
Are gay marriage advocates really asking for something special? In my humble opinion, yes and no. Through centuries of being seen as
abnormal, “freaks of nature” and Creation’s laughable mistake, homosexuals have
come to believe they are society’s rejects. In our age when freedom of expression is considered an
undeniable human right, they speak up, naturally! But I believe that behind all the noise they create, deep in
their heart of hearts all they want is to be accepted just like any other human
being. In that sense, No, they are
not asking for anything special.
But some of them who may have deeper wounds than others could, in
wanting to be accepted, unwittingly abuse their freedom of expression, and thus
clamor for “gay marriage”, oblivious to the fact that they are overstepping
boundaries and trampling on the heterosexuals’ rights and religious liberty to
preserve the meaning, purpose, and institution of marriage. In that sense, Yes, they are asking for
way too much.
For the record, let me just say here: I love gays—of both genders. And they love me, too. Whether strangers, colleagues or
friends, the gays in my life easily open up to me like I were the
reincarnation of Tia Dely Magpayo—they air their woes and fears, ask for my
advice and prayers, bring me gossip, daydream in my presence, give me beauty
tips, and in moments of euphoria talk to me about their bed habits until I
blush. They need not pretend with
me.
Encounters with gays both amuse and educate me and offer me glimpses
into the human condition, and when they speak most sincerely from their guts,
sometimes I am led into a different world—like that time I interviewed in the
mid-70s the first Filipino sex-change patient; or that instance when a priest
sighed to me about his inner struggle as a covert, non-practicing homosexual
bound by a vow of chastity; or when another gay friend just “born again and
accepted Jesus as his savior” over a cholesterol-laden dinner asked me, “Does
the Lord really want me to give up everything? Can’t I keep even only one boyfriend na lang?”
Sometimes I think gays open up to me because they sense I have an ear
and a heart for them. A It’s her kind of gay
that’s most poignant to listen to, because she hasn’t quite come to terms with
herself—she fumes when people ask if she’s gay. She insists she will marry a man someday, but while Mr.
Right hasn’t come along, she revels in same-sex affairs.
lesbian
friend says that with me she feels “like a tilapia in a tilapia pond”, at home
and cozy.
I feel blessed to have gay friends, for they can be some of the most
honest and brutally frank people around.
And while they bare their souls to me, they also take wholeheartedly
what I have to dish out—whether advice or admonition which I dispense with
clinical detachment. I never have
to mince words with them, like some days back when the subject of same-sex
marriage popped up as we were having cocktails at a movie premiere. My limp-wristed friends asked me if I’d
been to a gay wedding. I said no,
but told them about the first hand report on the churva
garden wedding I mentioned earlier (in Part 1 of this series).
My
friends thought my little story was a blast; we were the noisiest table in the
room. In a burst of optimism
one of them said, “There is hope for gay marriage for Catholics since Pope
Francis is pro-gay.” I snapped,
“Sorry to disappoint you, guys; the pope may be pro-gay, but not pro-gay
marriage—same with me,” and then I gave them a mean piece of my mind: “I love you all, you know that, and
whatever you do with your boy toys is your business, really, but don’t try to
change the dictionary, pleeeze!” (“Mother, we’re not changing the
dictionary, we’re crying for equal rights! Kayo lang ba ang may
karapatang magpakasal?”) “By
all means, fight for your equal ek-ek
rights,
privileges, opportunities, whatever, I’ll march to Malacanang with you
if you are getting inhuman treatment from anyone, but leave marriage
alone! (“But we want lifetime
commitment, fancy weddings, love in the open, mama!”) Legalizing your union, hindi
kaya ng powers kong pigilin yan,
but don’t call it a marriage.
Don’t try to create a “new normal” and call it by an old name—it won’t
work. Marriage is between a
natural male and a natural female, created for the propagation of the human
race, foundation of the family. To
make another human being you need sperm from the male and ova from the
female. That’s a fact of life, and
a law of nature. Even Grade 5
pupils know that. Sperm and sperm, ovum and ovum—no way! Male plus male equals a
swordfight. Female plus female,
clanging cymbals. Gets nyo?”
LOL! Mwah-mwah! Apir! Everybody’s happy—a win-win
situation. Despite the blunt
language they get my drift. I
think it’s because deep down inside they know that—I love gays, not because they’re
gay but because they are human beings.
And that’s the truth.





